Coast Range

VIEW DATA LAYERS IN COMPASS
Coast Range Ecoregion
Late Successional Mixed Conifer Forest within Oswald West State Park. Photo Credit: David Patte, USFWS

Description

Oregon’s Coast Range ecoregion is known for its dramatic scenery. It is also extremely ecologically diverse, with habitats ranging from open sandy dunes to lush forests and from marshes to headwater streams. Along the coastline, habitats are directly influenced by the marine environment and include beaches, estuaries, and headlands. The Coast Range includes the highest density of streams found in the state, and deciduous riparian vegetation is distinct from surrounding coniferous forests. The Coast Range ecoregion includes the entire reach of the Oregon coastline, bordering the Nearshore ecoregion, and extends east through coastal forests to the border of the Willamette Valley and Klamath Mountains ecoregions. 

The topography is highly variable, from coastal mountain ranges characterized by steep mountain slopes and sharp ridges to coastal lowlands. Elevation varies from sea level to Marys Peak, which is roughly 4,100 feet high; however, main ridge summits are approximately 1,400-2,500 feet.  

The Coast Range’s climate is influenced by its topography and cool, moist air from the ocean, making it the wettest and mildest in the state. These conditions are ideal for Oregon’s highly productive temperate rainforests, which are important ecologically and for local economies. Most of the ecoregion is dominated by coniferous forests. Large forest fires are historically infrequent but are severe when they occur. For example, the Tillamook Burn, a series of wildfires that occurred from 1939-1951, burned approximately 350,000 acres. Warming temperatures and changes in timing and patterns of precipitation due to climate change may increase fire frequency and severity in this ecoregion.  

Some towns in Oregon’s Coast Range ecoregion include Astoria, Bandon, Brookings, Cannon Beach, Elkton, Florence, Gold Beach, Lincoln City, Newport, Tillamook, Waldport, and Yachats. The largest urban area on the coast is in Coos Bay/North Bend, which serves as a hub for fishing, shellfish, forest products, and transportation. Forestry remains the primary industry in the interior portion of the ecoregion. The Oregon coast offers excellent recreational opportunities, and tourism is important to local communities. Commercial and recreational fishing and fish processing are significant components of the economy. The Coast Range is a popular destination for retirees, so retirement services are important to coastal communities. 

Characteristics

Important Industries

Forest products, agriculture, commercial fishing, fish processing, tourism and recreation, and retirement services 

Major Crops

Livestock forage, timber, beef and dairy cattle 

Important Nature-based Recreational Areas

Coos Bay, Tillamook Bay, Oregon Dunes National Recreation Area, Siuslaw National Forest, Clatsop and Tillamook State Forests, Elliot State Research Forest, Lower Rogue River, South Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, Cape Kiwanda, Jewell Meadows Wildlife Area, Coquille Valley Wildlife Area 

Elevation

From 0 to 4,100 feet 

Important Rivers

Alsea, Chetco, Clastskanie, Coos, Coquille, Illinois, Lewis and Clark, Necanicum, Nehalem, Nestucca, Rogue, Siletz, Siuslaw, Trask, Umpqua, Wilson, Yaquina, Youngs 

Conservation Issues and Priorities

Demand for property development is increasing due to growing numbers of people recreating, relocating, and retiring along the Oregon coast. Development in many communities is putting higher demands on surface water in streams, reducing flows during

 

The Siuslaw River Estuary in Oregon's Coast Range ecoregion.
Photo Credit: Oregon Coastal Management Program. The Siuslaw River Estuary in Oregon’s Coast Range ecoregion.

critical time periods. Tidal and lowland habitats, which are important for rearing fish, are also being significantly impacted by coastal development and agriculture. Growth of communities along US Highway 101 creates barriers to wildlife movement between coastal and inland habitats, and new roadways needed to accommodate growth impact fish at stream crossings and increase mortality risks for wildlife. Tourism is greatly increasing fish and wildlife exposure to human presence, particularly for shorebirds and waterfowl that use bays and mudflats near towns to feed and rest during migration.

Careful resource planning helps to balance these increasing demands while maintaining coastal fish, wildlife, and habitats. Coordinated, broad-scale planning is especially important given the diversity of the Coast Range ecoregion. Although many plans currently exist, such as the Northwest Forest Plan, there is a continuing need to consider the unique requirements of transitional zones such as estuaries, and to integrate marine and inland conservation planning.

Much of the ecoregion is publicly owned and managed to balance recreation, tourism, and conservation. However, ownership in the northern part of the ecoregion is particularly fragmented. Restoration of watershed processes and functions (e.g., floodplain connectivity), and restoration of habitat complexity (e.g., woody debris) to stream and riparian areas are major concerns throughout the entire Coast Range ecoregion. Restoring flows to headwater streams maintains ecological connections important for many species.

Changing climate conditions, such as warming temperatures and altered timing and patterns of precipitation, are impacting weather patterns. Shifts in water availability throughout the year may contribute to habitat loss for fish and amphibians, and warmer, drier summers are expected to increase the risk of wildfire. Warming stream temperatures are limiting summer rearing of some anadromous fish species. Altered hydrology, changes in storm patterns, and warming temperatures may also impact stream flows and estuaries, which serve as important habitat for many invertebrates, fish, and marine and terrestrial wildlife species.

Key Conservations Issues of particular concern in the Coast Range ecoregion include Land Use Changes, Climate Change, and Invasive Species. In addition to the statewide issues, oil spills, loss of estuarine habitat, recreational use, and loss of habitat connectivity are of particular concern in coastal areas.

Climate

The Coast Range terrain is varied, with steeply sloping mountains, hills, sand dunes, and beaches. The climate is maritime with warm, dry summers and mild, very wet winters. Mean annual temperature and precipitation fluctuate considerably due to the large variation in latitudes and elevations.  

Warming is projected in all seasons across the Coast Range ecoregion, with the largest increases projected for the summer. For a high emissions scenario (SSP585), summer average temperature is projected to increase by as much as 5°F for the 2040-2069 period and by as much as 8°F by the end of the century (Figure 1). Winters in the Coast Range are projected to be wetter, and summers are projected to be drier in the future. In late summer (July – September), total precipitation is projected to decrease by as much as 20% by the end of the century (Figure 2). For the cool season, projections show an increase in precipitation of 9%. The confidence in changes in cool season precipitation is greater than in late summer precipitation. For a high emissions scenario (SSP585), growing degree days are projected to double by the end of the century. Frost days are projected to decrease from an average of 63 per year to about 15–30 per year, on average, for the 2070-2099 period. 

Figure 1. Model median historical (1950-2010) and future projections of summer maximum temperature change for three periods


Photo Credit: ODFW.
Figure 1. Model median historical (1950-2010) and future projections of summer maximum temperature change for three periods (2010-2039, 2040-2069, 2070-2099) under a high emission scenario (SSP585) for the Coast Range. Future projections show increasing temperatures through the century, with less warming in areas adjacent to the Pacific Ocean (Raymond and Fusco, 2024).

 

Figure 2. Model median historical (1950-2010) total late summer precipitation and projected percent change for three future periods


Photo Credit: ODFW.
Figure 2. Model median historical (1950-2010) total late summer precipitation and projected percent change for three future periods (2010-2039, 2040-2069, 2070-2099) under a high emission scenario (SSP585) for the Coast Range. Future projections show decreasing late summer precipitation, with a greater decrease projected for the northern part of the ecoregion for the 2070-2099 period (Raymond and Fusco, 2024).

 

Limiting Factors and Recommended Approaches

Limiting Factor:

Land Use Conversion and Urbanization
CMP Direct Threats 1, 2.1, 2.3, 7.2

Some areas of the Coast Range are developing rapidly, especially coastal communities, such as Cannon Beach, Lincoln City, and Newport. Steep slopes limit the amount of land available for development, and concentrate it in sensitive areas, particularly flatter lowlands and wetlands near rivers and estuaries. Residential development contributes to habitat loss and can contribute to loss of industry, such as agriculture and forestry. Historic draining of wetlands and marshes for agricultural use has also had significant impacts. Coastal rivers, wetlands, and estuaries were altered when side channels were diked, marshes drained, and channels deepened. These changes removed necessary habitat complexity, degraded water quality, and reduced estuarine habitat for fish and wildlife.

Recommended Approach

Work with community leaders and local governments to encourage planned, efficient growth. Support existing land use regulations to preserve farmland and forestland, open spaces, recreation areas, wildlife refuges, and natural habitats. Provide outreach about the benefits of wetland and tideland restoration. Support riparian buffers on all streams. Where possible, remove dikes and tide gates to restore estuarine habitats. Where tide gates need to be retained, replace older gates with side-hinged or aluminum gates that improve fish passage and hydrologic functions.

Limiting Factor:

Water
CMP Direct Threats 7.2, 11.4

Water Quantity is a limiting factor for fish and wildlife. Changing climate conditions are leading to rising temperatures and altered patterns of precipitation, which affect water availability across different times of year. Surface water is the primary source of drinking water for nearly all municipal and community water providers along the coast. Some water providers currently face water shortages, and future shortages are anticipated due to decreasing supplies and increasing demand, especially during peak tourism season.

Water Quality can also limit species and habitats. Runoff from agricultural and urban areas can contaminate waterways. Landscape-scale application of herbicides in industrial timber operations can also negatively impact water quality. Warming temperatures, combined with higher nutrient levels due to agricultural runoff, are increasing the prevalence of toxic algal blooms, leading to shellfish fishery closures and fish and wildlife mortality. Timber harvest on steep slopes without control measures and agricultural grazing practices in moist soils along the coast contribute to increased sedimentation in streams, wetlands, and estuaries, causing changes in plant community composition, reducing habitat complexity, and altering water circulation and nutrient flows.

Recommended Approach

Provide incentives and information about water usage and sharing during low flow conditions (e.g., late summer). Promote water management actions that enable climate resilience and adaptation. Invest in watershed-scale projects for cold water and flow protection. Identify and protect cold water rearing and refugia habitat for aquatic species. Increase awareness and manage timing of applications of potential aquatic contaminants. Improve compliance with water quality standards and pesticide use labels administered by the DEQ and EPA. Work on implementing Senate Bill 1010 (Oregon Department of Agriculture) and DEQ Total Maximum Daily Load
water quality plans.

Limiting Factor:

Habitat Fragmentation
CMP Direct Threats 1, 2.1, 2.3, 3.3, 8.1

Increasing traffic volumes, road density, recreational pressure, resource extraction, and aging water control structures contribute to habitat loss and fragmentation and create significant barriers to animal movements. In this ecoregion, US Highway 101 runs north to south, limiting connectivity between coastal dunes, estuaries, and other shoreline habitats to inland wetlands, grasslands, and forests. At the northern end of the Coast Range, US Highway 30 bisects the Columbia River floodplain marshes and upstream tidal rivers. While Oregon Forest Practices Act rules help to maintain some structural components and diversity on the landscape, commercial timber harvest can fragment forested habitats, reduce tree species diversity, and limit forest structural complexity. Many water control structures, such as culverts, are old and have not been well-maintained. These aging structures are often inundated with sediment and may be perched above water courses, preventing use by wildlife and blocking movement of fish. Older tide gates alter hydrologic functions, block fish passage, and reduce estuarine habitats.

Recommended Approach

Where possible, remove dikes and tide gates to restore estuarine habitats. Where tide gates need to be retained, replace older gates with new innovations, such as side-hinged and aluminum gates that improve fish passage and hydrologic functions.

Work with community leaders, agency partners, tribes, and forest managers to protect wildlife movement corridors and to fund and implement site-appropriate habitat enhancement and restoration efforts to facilitate wildlife movement. Promote the protection, restoration, and maintenance of Priority Wildlife Connectivity Areas, following the guidelines outlined in Oregon’s Wildlife Corridor Action Plan. Work with the Oregon Department of Transportation and county and city transportation departments to improve wildlife passage across roadways and replace aging water control structures to improve hydrologic function and permit fish passage. Prioritize timber harvest practices that retain a diversity of tree and shrub species and habitat structural components, with variable density thinning to help retain connections between forested areas.
Preserve existing farmland while restoring ecological functions that have been lost or degraded, particularly in tidal lowlands. Provide incentives (e.g., financial assistance, conservation easements) and information about the benefits of maintaining fish and wildlife habitat. Broad-scale conservation strategies will need to focus on restoring and maintaining more natural ecosystem processes and functions within areas that are managed primarily for other values. This may include an emphasis on more “conservation-friendly” management techniques for existing land uses, and restoration of some key ecosystem components such as estuarine function.

Limiting Factor:

Invasive Species
CMP Direct Threat 8.1, 8.2

Non-native plant and animal invasions disrupt native communities, diminish populations of at-risk native species, and threaten the economic productivity of resource lands and waters. Invasive plants have increased substantially during the past several decades. In this ecoregion, Himalayan blackberry is widespread, with significant local impacts to meadows, riparian areas, and grasslands. Other invaders include reed canary grass, purple loosestrife, and yellow flag iris. Along the coast, European beach grass, introduced to stabilize shifting sands along roads, and gorse, introduced as an ornamental “living fence”, have substantial negative impacts. European beach grass alters dune formation and has narrowed beaches, drastically reducing open, sandy habitats that are critical to native species. Gorse crowds out native plants and chokes streams, reducing fish and wildlife habitat, and is also highly flammable, significantly increasing wildfire risk.
Invasive animals have also caused significant issues in the Coast Range. Non-native smallmouth bass have been illegally introduced to several areas in the ecoregion, including the Coquille Basin and Eel Lake, negatively impacting a variety of native fish species. American bullfrogs are rapidly expanding, competing with native species for limited resources or preying on native species and/or their eggs or young. Nutria degrade water quality and destabilize stream banks, while competing with native species, such as American beaver and muskrat, for food. Barred owls, expanding westward from their native range in the eastern US, compete directly with the native, threatened Northern spotted owl for food and habitat. Barred owls may also hybridize with spotted owls.
Emerging threats from invasive invertebrates are also becoming a concern in this ecoregion. The non-native emerald ash borer defoliates tree species characteristic of riparian habitats, such as Oregon ash, putting riparian areas, and in-stream habitats that depend on shading from bankside trees, at risk.

Recommended Approach

Emphasize prevention, risk assessment, early detection, and quick control to prevent new invasive species from becoming fully established. Prioritize management and control efforts to focus on key invasive species in high priority areas, particularly where Key Habitats and Species of Greatest Conservation Need occur. Where needed, use multiple site-appropriate tools (e.g., mechanical, chemical, and biological) to control the most damaging invasive species. Work with partners to implement measures to prevent unintentional introduction of non-native species (e.g., implement existing ballast water treatment regulations). Provide information to the public about the ecological and economic damage that invasive species cause. Work with the Oregon Invasive Species Council and other partners to educate people about invasive species issues and to prevent introductions of potentially high-impact species. Provide technical and financial assistance to landowners interested in controlling invasive species on their properties. Promote the use of native species for restoration and revegetation.

Limiting Factor:

Recreational Activity
CMP Direct Threats 1.3, 4.1, 5.1, 5.2, 5.4, 6.1

Activities like hiking, biking, hunting, fishing, camping, jet boating, foraging, unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV), and off-road vehicle use can create sensory stressors for wildlife, with sound, light, and unusual smells that may disrupt behavior and deter species from moving through certain areas. Recreation contributes positively to the Coast Range’s economy and local communities and is managed carefully in many areas. However, increasing numbers of recreationists can impact sensitive areas, such as shorebird nesting areas, tidepool habitats, and haul out sites for marine mammals. There are concerns with off-leash dogs in some areas. Off-highway vehicle use and target shooting are increasing on public forestlands, especially in areas near cities. In many areas, off-highway vehicle and mountain bike use is not closely managed, leading to habitat destruction as users create new networks of unsanctioned, unregulated trails. Dispersed recreation can cause new roads and trails to fragment the landscape and can cause the spread of invasive species from other locations. As inland areas experience more very hot days and more lands in inland ecoregions are closed to the public due to wildfire, public lands in the Coast Range are experiencing greater use.

Recommended Approach

Work with state and federal forest management agencies to plan recreational use and to increase education and outreach for recreationists and associated businesses. Work with land management agencies such as the USFS to designate areas as high value recreation and low habitat impact areas. Institute road and/or area closures to protect species during sensitive times of year and decommission roads when possible. Monitor to ensure that OHV rules for use and public lands motor vehicle use maps are enforced by the managing agencies. Improve public awareness of sensitive areas through signage and kiosks. Follow guidelines for responsible recreation, such as Leave No Trace, to minimize impacts.

Limiting Factor:

Oil Spills
CMP Direct Threats 4.1, 4.3, 9.2

Oil spills along the coast can have devastating effects on coastal habitats, fish, shellfish, and wildlife. Tidal flux can spread oil or other hazardous materials around sensitive habitats very quickly. Rapid response in the event of a spill is essential. Additionally, spills of hazardous materials or oil from vehicles traveling on roads along the coast could potentially impact nearby rivers, wetlands, estuaries, fish, and aquatic wildlife.

Recommended Approach

Ensure rapid response and preparedness for spills of hazardous substances. Oregon Department of Environmental Quality’s (DEQ) Marine Oil Spill Prevention Program and the Pacific States/British Columbia Oil Spill Task Force work with multiple parties and interested partners to address these concerns and quickly identify appropriate actions.

References

Raymond, C. L. and E. J. Fusco (Eds.). 2024. The State of Climate Adaptation Science for Ecosystems in the Northwest U.S. Prepared by the Climate Impacts Group for the Northwest Climate Adaptation Science Center. https://depts.washington.edu/nwclimateadaptation/socs/

Strategy Species

Conservation Opportunity Areas